Looking for clues

What I see is what I see,
yet it reflects only me,
a tiny fragment of reality
shaped by my own capacity.

What I hear is what I hear,
often more than reaches the ear,
all those voices in my head
telling me I'm getting mad.

What I feel is what I feel,
but just after I start to peel
away the masks of deception
and the skins of protection.

Naked I stand in front of you
and don't know what to do.

Attracting some blowies

Although I got used to the web, I get the impression it can drastically change, losing its ability for uncensored discourse in global public sphere. I came across an interesting discussion about a libel suit against a webforum, Sign of the Times. Eric Pepin, founder and creator of the Higher Balance Institute, didn't like the fact that articles about his court case were discussed, and claimed that this discussion caused more than a million dollar damage for HBI.

Pepin was charged with child abuse, he helped a disciple to 'cross the abyss' with a gay threesome. The video tape showing this enlightening activity had no date stamp, so the judge decided in favour for the accused, not without stating that he was not at all convinced of Pepin's innocence.

Laura Knight-Jadcyk, the target of Pepin's lawsuit, has already plenty of experience with online defamation. A bunch of people pop up whereever her name appears on the web, and unload a barrage of ad hominem attacks. And this for already 8 years. Interestingly enough, this annoying phenomena shows the trademarks of psychopathic behaviour, the topic of the book 'Political Ponerology', which Laura published in 2007.

Especially the discussion of Political Ponerology in the democratic underground forum teaches us a lot about psychopathic behaviour on the web.

The crazy thing about the libel suit against SOTT is that it might stuff free speech on the web entirely. On the other hand, reading some of the legal documents and forum slanders provides plenty of examples of the twisted reality psycho- and sociopaths live in.

Okay, StormBear, VB, Fulcanelli, Laurel Canyon and co, bring it on, soil another corner of cyberspace with your wicked vendetta.

Nobody told the Germans during Hitler's times that they were living in a evil fascist country. You need to understand the structure of the union of government and corporations to detect fascism at home, or wait until a 'liberator' installs the next flavor of pathocracy and declares the prior order of things fascist.

Communication breakdown

I ask you to share your knowledge
and you hide behind a hedge.
Unable to tell what you know
Stubbornly still running the show.

You ask me to take the same way
that lead your thinking astray
craving for a dubious wealth -
the artful skill of stealth.

The evil meme of certainty
and its brother dichotomy
made you one of their kind
and clouded your mind.

I do not search yet find
no cure for the blind.

The art of storytelling

Humans have the funny habit to construct their reality in very idiosyncratic ways. As part of the lengthy learning process, that distinguishes our species from others, we try to make sense of our sensations with the help of language. First we learn words for objects, actions and feelings, then we relate those to communicate our experiences with our environment.

This process happens interactively, subconsciously and slowly, repetition poses the key to successful meme tradition. Although languages systematically fail to describe anything in an meaningful manner, most of them contain concepts like 'truth' that make hardly any sense.

Yet 'making sense' happens literally during language acquisition: We find words for the objects we can reach with our senses, and we confirm ideas about 'reality' among our peers. Truth gets connected to trust in certain sources, often even to a class of sources. Nevertheless, this liquid and superfluous idea of truth causes heaps of trouble, conflict and even wars.

As belong as we believe that the concept of truth exists and has relevance, it prevents us from seeing reality at all. Instead, we only perceive a manifestation of our prejudices about the world we participate in. We might even fall prey to those people offering their special access to the 'truth', the success of self-acclaimed self-help gurus shows this gullibility of a large number of people.

While truth seems a totally obsolete concept to me, knowledge can replace it easily. Knowledge always describes information about systems in term of of structure, function and use, and does not in any way resemble a pile of mostly numerical data items. The aristotelian perspective on systems neglects the feedback between use and structure, and instead idealises concept based on assumptions that have been found false to fact since then.

The use of the word knowledge in the media and education systems does hardly reflect this dynamic quality as it still cherishes aristotelian misconceptions. Speculations about the future sound like facts when politicians and corporate spokespeople spruik them, and without a good bull shit detector one hardly can resist to believe at least that they believe what they say.

The permanent, systematic abuse of language makes communication real difficult, the pervasive appearance of restrictive memes in the public sphere successfully hypnotises large parts of the population. Although we all know that stories in TV, movies and the internet belong to 'fiction', we get lured by the foot-in-the-door trick to buy some of the circumstantial 'truths' hidden in them. We can relate to some of the interpersonal interactions, and accept easier the memes about an 'unchangeable' society, the need for a violent government and similar bullshit memes.

Most people have made no encounters with police in a conflict situation, but would give you nevertheless a colourful image about their idea how it would look like, most likely inspired by a blend of their level of paranoia and cinematic preferences. They know for sure because the repetition of structural information, appearing as backdrop to emotionally appealing settings, has cemented these ideas into their neural pathways.

To tell someone with this mindset about the psychopathic origin of the structures of our current society, could look like this:

General Semantick: See, our planet is so fucked up because a bunch of psychopaths set up the rules for all, and they did it in any that would always favour the next group of psychopaths.
Colonel Panick: That's conspiracy! Do you have any facts?
GS: Your reply consists of pure labelling, and indicates your desire to dominate the conversation instead of communicating.
CP: Still, I never heard such a strange idea before. After all, we are the defenders of freedom and democracy!
GS: If you never heard this idea before, you might as well show curiosity. Instead, you still resist to communicate and hide behind labels.
CP: Labels? I voted, I voted for change and it will come! Why's that a psychopathic system?
GS: The mere act of voting does not create a democratic society. You still try to defend your card house instead of peeping at mine. Everything changes while it passes through space-time, with or without politicians. Your 'vote for change' does not proof the existance of democracy, but merely reaffirms an essential quality of the universe and our experience with it.
CP: Quality of the universe? We haven't even conquered the world yet...
GS: By putting things into perspective we have a better chance to unveil their structures. Acoountability, legal equality, transparency and free speech tell us more about the state of society than 'changes in leadership by elections'. If you translate the word Führer, the title Hitler claimed for himself, you get 'leader'. I heard plenty of elected representatives of socalled democracies referring to themselves as leader. Have our societies changed structurally, enough to prevent abuse of power?
CP: I never thought about that before....
GS: Don't worry, that's absolutely normal in a sick society.

Of course, this conversation simply ignores the complexities that arise in situations involving different military rankings. I didn't spend any second of making it sound authentic, and I apologise proactively for my oversimplifications. And I take back my apology immediately.

We live in times with systems created by psychopaths, established to breed a psychopathic society. The success of this approach becomes easily apparent when switching through the TV channels, not to mention web surfing for that matter. I don't think this average madness comes as a byproduct of naive government, as it simplifies automating the control of everyone's life.

In aristotelian terms, we can choose between normal and crazy, with normal meaning adapted to a psychopathic society. A classical dilemma, a good example for the limiting mind trap set up by Aristotle. We can as well accept the futility of any binary approach to gain knowledge, and instead engage in removing pathlogical memes.

aristotelian believe change communicate concept cp gs hardly heard idea instead knowledge labels language memes normal people psychopathic quality society structure systems truth

created at TagCrowd.com

What?

The binary delusion
creates too much confusion
offers too little distinction -
it's ready for extinction.

Go from two to three
and re-learn to see
that all seems beautiful
or at least bountiful.

Go from three to seven
and create your own heaven.
Embrace your empty shell
to destroy your personal hell.

What is it all about?
Everything is allowed!

More wisdom compressed into sneaky sonnets:
Digital Noise
Blinded by science
Temporary Transmission

No such thing as free lunch?

The corporate media excels in fear mongering (does it really have any other purpose?), the uncritical media consumer hears dreadful stories about the global economic crisis, bailouts, billions of losses and other memes with little to no relation to perceivable realities.

Money is not an issue, it's just a sort of energy storage/transformation system. All that billions of different currencies that have been 'lost' in the 'economic turmoil' have never existed, unless you grant volatile digital information a similar status like your pet or your neighbor.

Unfortunately, in our times of global dementia, the maintainers of this digital information use the advantage of having being able to redistribute real wealth like property, land and media access for centuries to disguise this simple fact.

The plan to dispossess the majority of this planets population in order to own them as cheap source of labour and entertainment continues unimpeded, the current invented crisis just speeds up the process. While mass media complains about greed and bludgers, nothing is done to stop those greedy bludgers in high places.

There is no such thing as a free lunch, even the Murdochs, Packers, Pratts, Rockefellers and so on had to corrupt politicians systematically to install systems to accumulate their wealth on the expense of an entire planet. Yet the return of investment for being allied to the global mafia that uses its muscles named IMF, World Bank, G20, etc. to prevent sucessfully freedom and democracy outperforms mold in destroying its source of food.

Representative 'democracy' is a no-win game for those forced to play along, they simply cannot affort to lobby politico-parasites into submission. The imaginary economic crisis will affect probably millions of people, but we will see no single Wall Street banker lining up for dole money - governments rather spend taxpayers money for golden dole-handshakes.

In times of corporate socialism (or corporatism, or fascism) the dole bludgers are easy to spot: They appear on TV and ask for more government, more support for failing banks, and blame individuals yet never themselves. The matrix in action.

If I only had a million eyes to see into the future (and maybe a better camera....)







More stencils art here: The medium is the message.

Finally, a republican congress man says what's happening in the US: Martial Law. Under dictator Bush, the US congress lost most of its powers, now their only job is to nod to any talking point from the Bush junta.

Imperial Anniversary

Let us remember in awe the magnificent steps the empire took to strengthen its grip to world. Let us thank Immanuel Goldstein for his wicked plan to terrorize the world's population with a massive spectactle. Let us share the gratitude with Blackwater which experienced a breakthrough in the mass production of snuff videos.

After all, let us not forget that governments were the most vicious destroyer of innocent lives in the 20th century, but the Gods of bureaucracy have an insatiable desire for blood, so it can only stop if the people grew up and fight this cancer of society.

I regained my faith in Australian democracy. Pope Rudd connected with God to glimpse into the future, and came back to invent emerging dangers. "As nations grow and become more affluent, they also update their military forces." So speaketh our elected prophet.

A typical aristotelian statement, a piece of Ruddian common sense. But then, an elected leader in a democrazy has to have clairvoyant powers, his disciples expect nothing less. And so the present does just not matter enough to act, the prophesied future demands all financial attention.

Unfortunately, yet typically, most visions of politico parasites appear dystopic, even paranoid. Seer Rudd spoke of water, energy and food shortages, unstable nations in the neighborhood, endangered sea transport. He could not imagine that human ingenuity has easily surpassed the expectations of most pessimists by far, especially in the 20th century. The information revolution has just started, and the increase in number of life supporting inventions still accelerates. Although too many people still live in misery most people in the western world enjoy a wealth not available to the regents 200 years ago.

Consequently, the OECD report that showed the second least spending for education amongst industrialised nations, causes no worries to the Chosen One. Rudd worries along this lines: Some Asian nation will overtake Australia economically, and then use this power to buy better military equipment. Their superior marine and fighter jets will easily take over Australia, public bbqs will be transformed into woks, street sign will show cryptic letters in Asian alphabets, innocent blond surfer girls will be raped by vicious Asian invaders.

So instead of fostering education, which could see the emergence of solutions for problems like sustainable use of water, energy and food, better cultural understanding to lower the probability of the barbaric policy of warfare, Kevin's friend in the military industrial complex redirect heaps of taxpayer's money into their pockets.

Without enlightened leaders like Kevin, who knows for sure that war will come Australia's way, subversive believers in democracy like me might suffer from the delusion that provision of public infrastructure, education and efficient health systems identify a healthy and wealthy nation.

A Brumby a day keeps the clown away, or so the saying goes. For those living outside of the lucky island, Australia, some explanation follows. Brumby belongs to the class of parasites, which claim to represent their constituents. Although any society would be better off without professional politicians, the farce called representative democracy has not ended yet.

This means that the political parasitic class still enjoys a lifestyle on the livelyhood of other instead of their own means or merits. Not only that, these high level dole bludger demonstrate their incompetence regularly in all sort of media.

"I would hope that people would respect the right of farmers to make a choice."

Mr. Brumby, I would hope that politicos like yourself would respect the right of citizens to get what they voted for. Not, that Victorians had a chance to explicitly vote on the issue of GM food, nor that any politician who promised a GM free Victoria would go to jail for the end of the moratorium.

Mr. Brumby, I would hope that you keep the farmers choice free of subsidies, instead of marching up front and polluting the Victorian biosphere with GM canola. I would further hope that you use your position to finance more research into GM before destroying organic farming for ever. In case you didn't know, Mr. Brumby, GM food lacks independent research, and the glimpses of these research already unveil the blatant lies in Monsanto's shiny advertising.

Mr. Brumby, as a politician you should not hope that people respect your inane assumptions about reality, as a politician you should listen to the people before even considering obliterating organic farming in Victoria. But then, this can only apply in countries that take democracy seriously.

Mr. Brumby, thanks for providing more evidence that the political system in this country is as reasonable as the Muppet show, unfortunately much less funny. Please continue to refrain from thinking before talking to the media, so that the bullshit detectors won't stop buzzing.

Hurray, let the games begin!

The new prophet

Mr Brumby said: "I am categorically in the business of making the right decisions now to secure the long-term future of the state." Good on you, Mr. Brumby. I won't ask you what's your secret, you must have the rare gift of looking into the future.

In the past, a distant past, those claiming to know the future where usually burned, much to the amusement of the community, nowadays soothsayers go into politics. Or maybe Mr. Brumby's perception of right differs from a common sense approach. Or maybe he simply mistakes decisions providing his friends and himself with a permanent revenue stream of OPM (other people's money, also called tax) with "the state".

Of course, one could call a statement like Mr. Brumby's, aired when asked to justify a decision clearly targeted against Public transport, preposterous, mindless or plain stupid. But maybe it's just visionary. It certainly secures a lot of party contributions, individual spending money for a bunch of advisors and consultants, lots of overtime for the police dealing with protest against this tunnel.

An elected politician can't be that stupid - he wouldn't be selected otherwise, right? He must belong to that special breed of people who simply know it better, otherwise he wouldn't be in the business of making the right decisions for the long-term future, right?

Representative democracy might be just another name for feudalism. A real democracy could afford it ask its citizens about vital decisions. A society on the way to some real democracy would make its decisionmaker responsible for their decision, and not grant them with lifelong pensions for helping their networks or plainly doing nothing.

But that's the magic of words. Call a nation democratic, and hardly anyone suspects it to be corporatism (a neologism for fascism, in case you didn't know). Call a soothsayer politician, and then you don't need to burn them for using witchcraft in public.

Maybe next time you read or hear in the mass media about "what the public thinks", you can be brave enough to think for yourself, instead following sheeplike a statement that just turn into a public opinion by idiots believing in the benevolence and superiority and authority of those wanting more for themselves as the deserve in a just society.

In case you didn't know, even the mafia calls protection rackets "contribution to the community". If you expect politicians to admit that they are part of a criminal organisation, and believe their public statements that they act in the interest of society, you might as well believe in Santa Claus. Just never underestimate the power of fairy tales, but don't be surprised if you wake up some day in a full blown fascist society.

A friend said: you cannot claim copyright on pics of things that have not occured. I wonder how this might apply to this shot, but then i don't. Anyway, feel free to use this copylefted image where ever you want.

A glimpse of hope. A piece of disturbing information. Putting it back together. Pulling everything apart. Universal reunification of individual illusion. Whatever.

Hell, I love PBS. Their eclectic collection of music stuns me more and more. I heard this tune earlier this week, and it made my day. I dedicate this one to Rosa Sparx, the artist responsible for Insultadarity. Hope you like the tune, Rosa.

We need a One-World Government

In my humble point of view, humans can organise their affairs without any formal government. Before the introduction of written language, which enabled the evil principle of bureaucrazy (typo intended), the concept of government hardly existed at all.

Of course, most historians have some objections against this point of view, and do their best to create a perception of history that never questions the usefulness of government. Leadership certainly exists in primate gangs, but it differs significantly from the infection with formalised forms of governance the human race suffers from currently.

Although I consider the nonsense of governments detrimental for the human evolution, I have arranged myself with their existance. I appreciate company and lack the survival skills of an Unabomber, which makes it virtually impossible for me to live in a place without any government.

Yet as long as humanity is infected with the inhumane idea of government, I certainly prefer democracy instead of dictatorship. Unfortunately, democracy doesn't exist on this planet, although some nations like Switzerland come a bit closer to a society where all citizens have their say in common affairs.

Representative democracy, however, fails to deliver participation of all, and differs hardly from feudalism, which the French revolution ostensibly eradicated. The US and its phony elections in this millenium serve as perfect example why the name democracy doesn't suit the organisational structure of its society: Although both times Bush got "elected" by massive manipulations, the vote fraud was simply swept under the carpet.

The funny political games others play would not bother me too much, if the parasites of society, also called politicians, wouldn't demand some large protection racket (euphemistically called taxes). In peaceful times this protection racket partially served a decent purpose: Besides financing a luxurious life style for the god fathers and capos of the political system some of the money got spend for the community in form of infrastructure.

911 has changed the world (or so the saying goes...), and serves since 2001 as carte blanche to remove the remaining illusion of democracy. The political parasites now use this excuse not only for a redistribution of wealth within their controlled territory, but also to finance mass killings and destruction of arable soil outside their "official" sphere of regency.

People in the US, or here in Australia, or back home in Europe, hardly notice the amount of their money spend on bloodshed in the name of "freedom and democracy", nor the systematic withdrawal of governments from their traditional role to provide services to their citizens.

The mass media mind fuck works just too well. Scared into submission, artificial targets take the blame for obsolete governments: Terrorists, foreigners, disbelievers, homosexuals, communists, conspiracy buffs, native people, social loafers, binge drinking youth.

I found this interesting op-ed piece in a small American "News" site: Humankind benefits from New World Order: We need One-World government. Let's have a look at some of the myths the author tries to materialise in this piece of disgrace for journalism.

The Bilderberg Group [...] are powerful, influential, and civic-minded overachievers who enjoy each others company.

The conspiracy-minded lunatic fringe argues: How come only international bankers, politicians and media heavyweights are invited? Well duh, it's only natural that the powerful would want to network with each other; I'm not holding my breath waiting for an invitation.

Some conservative nuts need a bogeyman (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commissions) to explain their failure to achieve anything of significance. "I'm working at Burger King because the Bilderberg Group is destroying America by outsourcing all the good jobs."

So far, so good. Attentive readers have noticed already the retarded ad hominem way of argumentation. And of course the lack of any real arguments. (Feel free to check the link to the original article to see how I distorted the line of argumentation to make my point here.)

Omissions can create lies easily, and the list of participants offers only to politically/economically interested people insights what kind of "networking" happens during the Bilderberg meetings. Sorry, Britney Spears didn't come, just the Queen of England, Condi Rice, Henry Kissing and David Rockefeller might qualify as celebs during that meeting.

I wish there were an international group of statesmen working to set up a one-world government. Sovereignty will one day be a thing of the past; it's a luxury this little world can no longer afford. Only a one-world government can adequately address the great issues of today: Overpopulation, terrorism, global warming, pandemics, tribal warfare, oil crisis, poverty...

Now it's getting interesting. At the end of the list of "great issues" appears one item that certainly deserves a place there: poverty. Global warming might be another, the rest springs from a paranoid mind.

It's a global economy, it's a global village and eventually it will be a one-world government. Don't be on the losing side of history, get with the program.

It's a global mind fuck, and I won't "get with the program". I'd rather program my mind myself, than submitting myself to the idea of a global abolition of the attempt of democracy. Centralisation of power has already successfully eroded democracy in Europe, and a One-World government has no means of addressing the needs of local communities.

The consumerist world ridiculed the idea of Mao's blue ants. One size fits all? No fucking way, consumers define themselves by choices, we are all Induhviduals. Sure, there's the white collar and blue collar uniform, but with the freedom to choose the brand of your suit or costume, the colour of the tie, the interior of the car the illusion of identity is created.

Global village? Get real, the majority of people dwell in cities in the 21st century. The dynamics and the stratification of cities differ drastically from a village. Hardly any village would tolerate different religions, yet a city allows peaceful coexistance of a variety of believers and non-believers.

No single instance can cater for the needs of all. Each concentration of power allows abuse on a larger scale. Only by negotiating common affairs societies can develop cohesion, and offer the freedom to choose - a One-World government can only exist as dictatorship.

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I just can't rape my mind enough to stop questioning authority. In a capitalist world, I pay for those suckers representing authority, whether I want to or not. But no matter how often I read praises for the suppressors of human evolution, I won't "get with the program".

affairs although authority bilderberg create democracy differs freedom global government group hardly human mind one-world people political power program serve society village world

created at TagCrowd.com

Hooray - Queen's birthday!

When I had my arvo stroll around the hood, I noticed that plenty of places didn't open on this public holiday. The secular Australian 24/7 society takes a break, at least for Easter (the pagan fertility festival), Christmas (the Sun god worshipping time) and for the Queen's birthday.

Coming from a society that abolished any special treatment for the ancestors of ruthless murderers, suppressors and thieves, also euphemistically called aristocracy, about 90 years ago, this public holiday seems more than bizarre to me.

Although Australia claims to be a democracy, there's no public holiday for the birthday of democracy (Please don't mistake the Invasion Day celebration for something like this). Democracy has just reached a fetal state on this planet, threatened by various attempt to abort this promising child, mainly by massively intoxicating its 'mother', society, so a public holiday to celebrate democracy would be indeed premature.

The principle of aristocracy cannot be found in nature, even though biologists use terms like 'queen bee' and the like, to rationalise and glorify the parasitic existence of aristocrats.

The 'queen' of a beehive, however, does not own everything, nor can it withdraw itself from its life giving role or arbitrarily make rules. The queen bee is nothing else but a breeding machine, fulfilling a specific role in this insect society. The queen bee's offspring is nothing special, and any of the queen's 'children' is capable of founding a new hive. Discriminating aristocrats and commoners makes absolutely no sense, the structure of a beehive requires specialisation, somebody's gotta do the job of a breeding machine.

The queen's offspring has to become workers and soldiers, there are no commoners that can be exploited to do the nasty jobs. I don't know if giving birth is as laborous for bees as it is for humans, but in my point of view there's nothing glorious about permanently giving birth (or any other specialised role in a bee society).

Bee hives have some democratic mechanism, making decision based on majorities to decide how to assign resources most efficiently for the entire hive. The bee dance works like a referendum, and the bees as species survived easily doing this on a daily basis, instead of trusting one of them that managed to have a lucky shot once.

The language we use, however, influences our thoughts and behaviour. From a evolutionary point of view, nothing distinguishes a member of the royal family from those 25,000 human being that starve daily. We all belong to the species of human beings, with differing local environments that determine the likelyness of individual life expectancy.

The macro environment of our species supports even more human beings than currently inhabit this planet, yet the viral ideas of ownership, hierarchy and nations systematically penalise thousands of us for crawling out of the 'wrong' womb.

Aristocracy acts more like tapeworm - feeding of the host (society) and making it sick in the process. No reasonable human being would celebrate the day when a tapeworm nested in its guts, yet anyone affected would cherish the day when the cure arrives.

The term democracy has degenerated to a mere unspeak term, bereft of its ideas of freedom, equity and fairness. To call Western societies at the start of the 21. century 'democracy' is as suitable as claiming Hitler engaged in population control (which is something Bilderberg founder Prince Berhard, a former Reiter-SS member, might have said...).

I don't mind having public holidays. And I would certainly celebrate the day when the Buckingham palace is no longer inherited by some parasites, and the unjustly accumulated resources get redistributed to the human species. There will be no need to kill aristocrats, just disown them and put them on the dole.

Officially, European monarchs have no longer political influence. Yet, the Dutch and the Spanish queen, a Dutch and a Belgian prince attended this years prime parasite meeting, the Bilderberg conference. But as the official political circus has only minimal influence on the distribution of resources in comparison to corporations, they still rule by proxy.

So for me, celebrating the Queen's birthday in Australia, just indicates that 'democracy' still awaits its birth on this planet.

When I returned from a leisurely late sunday noon breakfast, enjoying the warmth of the sun on my way back home, I saw something strange in the sky. Besides some typical cumulus clouds, some thin, hazy layers of something hung in the sky.

One patch looked especially strange, spread out in an oval shape, dispersing the colours of a rainbow on its edges. I thought at first that my sunnies produced this effect, and stared for some minutes in disbelieve skywards, and then got into my unit to get my camera.

The colours at the edge of the milky patch lost a bit in intensity, and I could only hope that a picture taking against the sun would show a bit of this weird effect.



As the sun hid a bit behind parts of this funny stuff, the shots turned out better than I thought. The small versions here in the blog make it difficult to spot the details, and after various compressions the quality degenerates a bit. However, you can check the full resolution image as well, especially if you have an idea how this strange phenomenon occured.



Hearing stories about chemtrails can make you a bit paranoid... personally, I don't like the idea that someone (eg the US government) systematically pollutes our sky with some wild mixture of chemical and biological agents. Yet, governments started already 50 years ago experimenting with their population, and surely wouldn't brag about this.

Keep your eyes open, and enjoy the sun and blue skies whenever you can. Maybe take some photos of strange phenomena at the sky and try asking your political representatives for explanations.

The strict sexual taboos imposed by the Church created widespread fears of impotence, as we can tell from the countless Church edicts forbidding attempts to restore potency by magical means, from the demand for restoratives, and from the fact that witches were constantly accused of blighting potency, as we shall later see in more detail. Such potency difficulties are precisely what one would expect to find in a period when the sexual act was represented as a mortal sin.

I found this quote in an interesting book called 'Sex in history' by G. Rattray Taylor. Although Taylor refers in this paragraph to the 12. century, I was immediately reminded of the daily Viagra spam emails, and the massive posters brandishing Melbourne asking bluntly: Want longer lasting sex?

Fear of impotence appears as a common phenomenon in the western world. Sexual taboos still repress our society, harvesting numerous mental disorders.

Bilderberg 2008

Have we missed out? Rumours on the evil internet indicate that the 2008 meeting of our benevolent tyrants, the Bildergroup Group, has already taken place near Athens, Greece, on either the first or second weekend of May.

If it has, the Bilderbergers managed with a simple shift of the date to move out of the global spotlight, tricking their most eager observers like Jim Tucker and Daniel Estulin. Although we know 'just' the list of participants for some of the meeting, the absence of even this information opens the gates to speculation wide.

Amazingly, mentioning the names of participants in Wikipedia raises objections. I put the participants list for 2005 and 2006 there, including references, but the pages didn't survive. Unless the Bilderbergers have sinister aims in minds, nobody should be worried to be identified as part of network of power players.

Observers of the Bilderberg Group suspect since long that these elusive elite have not the best interest of the world population at heart, rather the opposite. Their efforts changed the perception of the Bilderbergers from conspiracy theory to an odd fact.

A real secretive meeting this year promises impeding doom. Which presidential candidate got invited? Or none? Has Bush been given permission to attack Iran in June as pretext to suspend elections at home? Will the prize for a barrel of oil jump to $200? Will they release of killer virus? Will food crisis and global warming taken as excuse to implement more (world) government? Will the use of HAARP and weather war be intensified?

The ruling class always thought of their population as a dispensable resource. They certainly prefer to herd a single flock of sheeple than this dreadful cultural diversity believing in the illusion of democracy and sovereignity. What interesting times we live in.

Super, Kevin!

The lap dog of George Bush did it again. According to Kevin Rudd the Iranian president should be
brought to the International Court of Justice for inciting violence. Kevin, if you could speak as good Arabian as you speak Chinese, you could notice that most allegations against Ahmadinejad are made in US think tanks and Murdock media.

While you continue to befriend Jiabao, while he commits genocide in Tibet and calls Dalai Lama a terrorist, you show public concern about a demogogue in the Middle East.

STRUTH!

Many people spend a lot of time pondering about truth, yet their ideas usually don't belong to the common knowledge. From two sides professional "Truthers" appear: science and religion. When it comes to the origin of our phenomenal universe, we have to choose sides whether we follow along the idea of a creator or that of a Big Bang.

I don't want to suggest in any way that I know this very answer, though I have some specific ideas. However, I don't think they matter. And I don't think that the "real" answer to this question really matters. although the answer an individual gives him/herself relates strongly to this individual's way to interact and communicate.

In most situations, "truth" as such has no special relevance. Although the western world claims to follow the principles of enlightenment, lies belong much more to our fabric of reality than truth. We lie to our children when we tell them that the sun sets and rises, and we lie to them when we talk about Santa.

Children understand the concept of lies at a relatively late, some claim as early as 6, others say 9 to 10 years of age. Children understand the concept of an endless unknown readily, and the Boogieman, bed bugs, super heroes, santa claus, allah, jahwe and god fill bits of this void.

Truth has rather interactive character than objectively measurable features in a young age. Most bits of abstract concepts labeled truth stem from the same people that provide the child with food, care and love. Truth and trust get mixed up, information from trustworthy sources compose the child's view of the world.

Some qualities of our phenomenal environment become the basis for our understanding of the world, luckily before the minds grasps the weird concept of truth. Things fall down, objects continue to exist even if invisible, animate and inanimate objects act differently, objects have different qualities like texture, taste, smell, shape and colour - we explore our environment by actively exploring and experiencing it.

The curiosity of fresh human beings seems endless, and caring parents arrange for a socially acceptable range of experiences. Communication allows to name things and to talk about these experiences. The grown-ups seem to have experienced other things, and are not easy to trick in varbal communication. Without knowing a lie we can only trust, which means most basic assumptions about life entered our mind absolutely uncritically.

After we learned about Santa Claus lie, we find ourselves in a dilemma. Do we lose our trust in our primary peers, or do we accept the arbitrary (and untruthful) nature of truth? We still live in dependency of our primary peers, so we have to accept the virtuality of reality. Experience becomes the less important source of knowledge gathering and the search for truth, expertise takes the first place.

We waste no time for fact or plausability checking in the first years of information gathering and shaping of the mind, so that the facility for critical thinking remains underdeveloped, unless specifically fostered. The unimpeded flow of life, a succession of social interaction, experiment and experience changes when the day get sliced up into school lessons.

Not understanding, but repetition lays the foundation for what most people spout out as tidbits of truth. Each time we see the sun "rising" on the horizon, we reaffirm the reality of a flat earth in the center of the universe. We live in a time that cherishes rationality, yet use a language that ridicules the advances in human knowledge.

Since Gödel we know that any approach to describe reality in abstract terms leads to either incomplete or contradictory systems. In my point of view, that applies to language as well. We can keep ourselves busy fighting about truth, like many people do - which reminds a bit of the attempt to use a spoon to stir an ocean. Mutual understanding exists independent of any objective truth, communication creates a common reality.

Most of "truths" in our minds relevant for social interaction belong rather to this unspeakable category. Stories model our behaviour towards other people, those we experienced immediately and vicariously. The power of large number occurs as theme over and over - masses seem to know the "truth" intuitively.

Nobody can know what masses think, whether they exist as a coherent temporary stable phenomenon or what drives them. But that doesn't anybody to spread ideas about mass opinions, and if mass media does so, reports about the people's voice become self fulfilling prophecies.

The fun starts when you begin to deconstruct reality. Open your eyes. Now.

accept belong bits children concept exist experience ideas interaction knowledge lie mass mind objects people reality social things think trust truth understanding world

created at TagCrowd.com

Corporate Takeover Part 2



Julia Gillard, the o so empowered female Deputy Prime Minister of Australia, wants more performance checks for schools. "I think we need to understand in a much more sophisticated way what's going on in schools. And I think the more information that enables people to understand it in a sophisticated way, the better."

Performance checks have become the latest craze in corporate madness, yet not every interaction is quantifyable. Basic literacy and numeracy skills, subject to Julia's desire to measure more, should not take 10 years to teach. However, measuring performance of a poorly designed system does not yield any valuable information. The results can either confirm the bad state of the system (if students manage to leave school illiterate, it proves major deficiences) or even worse, they can show "that it's all not that bad".

Did we know more by counting dead birds after the Exxon Valdez accident? The low official body count in the Iraq war does not change the fact of an illegal invasion. Measuring does not always help to gather useful data, to the contrary. Scales for grown, yet undesigned system like the education system, can only be arbitrary. As long as the goals for education lack an agreed and reasonable definition, performance checks provide nothing.

The implementation of this splendid plan requires plenty of consulting and administration, another project to redistribute tax money in friend's pockets. How many education units does an average teacher successfully to her/his students? Can the students still be herded in bigger classes? How much mandatory donation can parents contribute?

Meanwhile, kids leave school that cannot read.

Corporate takeover

A world government would never consist of democratically elected politicians, but of a selected group of well connected people. We see this process already clearly happening in the European Union, that slowly turns into an entirely uncontrollable governmental entity, already with its own police, secret service and soon army.

The US faces a different change in its sovereignity with the North American Union. The biggest and more immediate threat, however, consists of Bush preparations for Martial Law. Besides creating heaps of bills that basically make him dictator, the FBI created with Infragard the logistics for a violent takeover.

Thanks to Amy Goodman, and the poster of the following clip.

Chinese puzzle

I don't really know whether Tibet belongs to China, although a nation with a billion people certainly encompasses more than one people. I cannot deny my admiration for the Dalai Lama, which appears like a spiritual leader to me, unlike eg the Pope, who leads one of the wealthiest organisations on this planet, and acts more like a CEO trying to hard sell his product.

So I felt quite shocked when the Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao described Dalai Lama in similar terms US politicians talk about Osama Bin Laden, especially considering that he just asks for cultural, but not political independence for Tibet.

As the Chinese government blocks access for journalists to Tibet right now, a bilateral view on the events happening there does not come easy. However, anyone with a bit of common sense should consider that governments blocking access for the media did so to hide their crimes.

So another useless slaughter of innocent life happens in the tibetan region, conducted by the host of the next Olympic Games. The promise to improve the Human Rights situation has been broken, the Chinese government still makes some extra money by selling organs of Falun Gong supporters, killing Tibetans and giving a damn about the world wide reactions.

But in the style of mafia families, most governments don't really care about what their fellow criminals do in another terroritory. So i don't really expect anything to change - governments killing randomly parts of their own population are normal. Speaking out against governmental violence is terrorism, and as a nuclear power China has the moral right to kill innocent people, just like the US in Iraq and Afghanistan, Russia in Chechnya and Israel in Gaza and Lebanon.

The moral of this story? There is none. "Civilised" nations have the licence to kill, and as long as enough sheeple subsidise governmental murder things can hardly change. O, how much I wish to experience democracy during my lifetime... but as long as oligarchy, disguised as representative democracy, is widely accepted, we can happily feel guilty sponsoring murder by taxes.

Temporary Transmission

The evolution of consciousness
Prevents planetary madness
The evolution of consciousness
Relieves you from stress

The evolution of consciousness
Happens in your mind and ass
The evolution of consciousness
Paves the road to happiness

Interconnected by fields of energy
Our touch creates sweet synergy.

We are all in it together
chaotically linked like the weather.

Mankind awaits the new sensation:
Tasty fruits of conscious collaboration.

awaits chaotically conscious consciousness cooperation creates energy evolution fruits happens happiness interconnected linked mankind paves prevents relieves stress sweet synergy tasty together weather

created at TagCrowd.com

Freedom of speech? Not in the US

Not only does the US government endorse and practise torture, it also abuses its root DNS servers to suppress freedom of speech.

Remember 2001? At the end of that year George Adolf Bush announced to use all his power to track the money trail to the "terrorists". Nobody had told him at this time that tax havens like the Cayman Islands or Liechtenstein were used not only to finance terrorists, but play an essential role to launder the CIA's drug trafficking money and are generally used for a lot of dodgy tax schemes to make filthy rich people even richer.

So no bank was checked, and even the $100,000 that Mohammed Atta received from the boss of Pakistan's ISI (who coincidentally met with Dick Cheney around 911) were forgetten about.

Not everyone working for banks thinks that supporting immoral greedy parasites is a good thing, so someone working for the Cayman Island branch of the Bank Julius Bär blew the whistle and leaked informations about the tax evaders using their service.


Wikileaks.org, an organisation fighting actively for the freedom of speech, was eradicated by American courts from the DNS servers, in an desperate attempt to protect a lot of white collar criminals which damage their nations economy on a much larger scale than millions of dole bludgers ever could.

However, as the server is hosted in Sweden, it cannot be simply shut down, just the convenience of accessing the site by an easy to remember name is gone, yet it can still be reached by its IP address http://88.80.13.160/ .

Of course, if Adam Curtis is right that the masses are stupid, noone cares. But maybe more people realise how fascist the US under Bush has became and bloody stop supporting this genocidal democracy hating regime. I guess I never stop dreaming.

War - what is good for?

Frankie Goes To Hollywood: Absolutely nothing.
US Military Industrial Complex: Some trillion dollars since 911.
Social Darwinists: Prevention of overpopulation.

In modern times, let's say in the last 3000 years or so, war served business purposes. On a macro-economic scale, however, war just wastes valuable resources and yields hardly more luxury than agricultural ways of living. But the inventiveness of mankind increased the usefulness of the limited resources available, so that the average wealth increased, and thus made wars ever more profitable.

Predatory animals need a relatively high level of aggressiveness just to pursue a living, and this evolutionary successful instinct exists in human beings as well. A small number of highly aggressive people can subordinate a large number of others to make their own life more resourceful, the Aryan Brotherhood poses an interesting example in our time.

Although we lack evidence of war in prehistoric times, it unlikely looked like heaven, all peaceful and good. In a hunter and gatherer society other groups of humans could have easily been considered as prey, and cannibalistic tribes have survived until the last two centuries (or even until today). Scarcity of resources might lead to "wars" as well, killing another tribe for survival.

Interspecies aggression happens a lot, among sea anemones, ants, monkeys and humans. Yet, if we understand evolution, we can see light at the end of the tunnel.

Aggression, the innate animal survival strategy, and war, its commercial brother, belong to the memes of life. But if consciousness distinguishes humans from other animals, we can transcend this animalistic past by conscious control.

If we see our planet as finite economic system, warfare loses all justification. It destroys valuable resources, concentrates wealths in the hands of few, and generally prevents a more equitable distribution of the planet's resources.

Nowadays, the major information distribution outlets have very strong ties to the military industrial complex, and glorifies past and present war efforts. The mainstream media encourages a local perspective (better us then them) and neglects the global insanity of war, and especially who makes most money out of it.

Instead we read about ideological or religious differences that caused wars. Have you never wondered why you hear rarely about the costs of war? You can see a lot of heroes, sometimes victims, hear stories with little evidence. War allows our capitalistic world a break from the dreadful money to destroy our empathy with permanent pictures of human madness.

Lethal intergroup competition such as wars have most likely their place throughout human history, but without cooperation no bounty could have ever been scored. Civilized societies transformed this instinct into sports, a vicarious fight without lethal victims. Unless, of course, hooligans get encouraged to fight their own battle.

If acted out aggression belongs to the animal kingdom, mankind could prove its godlike status by evolving beyond the urge to kill each other. As Buckminster Fuller said: There is enough for everyone.

Evolution has never stopped. We won't speed it up by genetic engineering but with the conscious control of our individual and collective evolution.

Not honouring the dead

Bans on irc happen easily, yet sometimes a bit surprising. Reminding Australians that their fellows were abused in any war they were fighting for the Brits or the Americans causes heaps of objectivions to the typical predictive programming Australians went through. Amazing.

"Don't mention the war" has become a running gag among my mates who introduce me as "German", and I had lots of fun trying to keep up with the stereotypes thrown at me. While my mum made me a pacifist when recalling her childhood memories during the WWII, the perception of German people still clings more to bad American TV series than any historic or psychological account.

While I happily take any Nazi allusions with a contended, yet desperate smile, reminding Australians about the abuse their soldiers took under British and US command evokes jingoism instantly. I'm aware about the genocide my fellow countrymen did, white Australians still seem to consider themselves to live natively here. Reminding Ozzies that British and American officers and generals send Australian soldiers as cannon fodder around, is "dishonouring" the death.

I've seen the WWII frontline in the Northern Territory, but Australians (unless they were unfortunate soldiers fighting another countries war) were spared from the immediate experience of war (mainly because they never considered eradicating the native population of an invaded continent as war).

So the Ozzie experience of war is more like joining their masters in a stupid war abroad, and celebrating those who managed to survive this insanity. The genocide of the native population is not just ignored, but continues today and is noticeable with the statistics about life expectancy for black and white Australians.

I don't mind being reminded about the war - I didn't fight it, and was considered unsuitable for the German military. If I was proud about German military achievements, I would be called a Nazi. Reminding Australians how their soldiers were abused in the Boer war, WWII and Vietnam turns out different... means thinking stops and nationalism rises.

The power of memes amazes me more and more. It makes people identify with situations, which they have not the faintest clue about, and breeds more people willing to sacrifice themselves for phony promises.

I guess it's just life. It might be psychologically easier to identify with killed idols than with a genocidal bunch. I still don't believe that Australians have killed more people for "good causes" than they killed to take over the continent. I just realised it's unpopular to say so.

Of course, not all Americans are a bunch of fucking morons. Just the ones with money and in power, bringing the rest of the world down with spending billions of dollars to kill innocent people, send lawless contractors on rape holidays in distant countries most Americans couldn't even find on a map. Well, someone rants more eloquently about this.

Unfortunately, internet censorship works faster than I expected. I can still the video on facebook, but some gatekeepers have removed it from public access. Well, that's life. Telling the truth is unpleasant for the parasites running this planet, especially if it's on the money. Nevertheless, I could dig out the website of the ranting gryphon who provided the world with a different perspective on America and Americans.

Woah, I found another copy on youtube.. enjoy it while it lasts.

The conflict in Northern Iraq escalates more and more. The US happily tolerates Turkish attacks in the Kurdish areas in Iraq, all while the Turkish government has "credible intelligence" that Kurdish terrorists might seek retribution.

And, indeed, like promised by the Turkish government, a terror attack hit a region in Turkey inhabitated mainly by Kurdish people. Although no one claimed as yet responsibility, Kurdish activists are blamed straight away. And even SBS concludes that this latest terror attacks "obviously" are the retribution for the air strikes in Northern Iraq, as announced by the Turkish government.

What happened to journalism in Australia? Obviously, independent sources are no longer sought, and any governmental statement is taken at face value, even from a government that just started to finish the genocide of Kurdish people, breaking international law and bombing innocent people to smithereens.

What happened to the Australian media consumer? It seems like they stopped thinking entirely, believing in the massive, global terror threat, and ignoring the millions of people killed by the US, Britain, Pakistan and now Turkey.

Britain has already introduced laws that reek like thought crime, and soon Australia will follow suit and muzzle independent thinking as well. Only "experts" will be allowed to comment on terrorism, and those sit in so-called democratic governments.

Terrorism exists. It's the preferred strategy of so-called democratic governments to abolish democracy. Orwell's eternal war against terror entered the real world after 911, and instead of asking for more control about the governmental mafia called intelligence services, these legalised criminals get away with more and more bloodshed.

Citizens not only have to pay more than a tithe to subsidize governmental murder, but soon their own enslavement. And they cheer, because the media told them that "something" has to be done against terrorism, and feel safer while the terrorists in government take away civil liberties, which took centuries to be established.

Meanwhile, the governmental terrorists cover their backs by transforming democracy into fascism, which is euphemistically called "Public-Private Partnership". Happy New Year.